![]() |
|
How do you set up number of workers in Playwright for optimal test execution? or What's the best way - Printable Version +- Proxy Community (https://proxycommunity.com/forum) +-- Forum: Proxy Tools (https://proxycommunity.com/forum/forum-proxy-tools) +--- Forum: Go Login (https://proxycommunity.com/forum/forum-go-login) +--- Thread: How do you set up number of workers in Playwright for optimal test execution? or What's the best way (/thread-how-do-you-set-up-number-of-workers-in-playwright-for-optimal-test-execution-or-what-s-the-best-way) Pages:
1
2
|
How do you set up number of workers in Playwright for optimal test execution? or What's the best way - deepDartX77 - 05-01-2025 "What's the best way to set up number of workers in Playwright for parallel testing?" Hey folks! 👋 So, I've been tinkering with Playwright and trying to figure out how to *set up number of workers in playwright* for max speed without nuking my machine. From what I’ve seen, just slapping `--workers=4` (or whatever) in the CLI *kinda* works, but is there a smarter way? Like, should I match it to CPU cores? Or is there a sweet spot? Also, does it even matter if my tests are I/O-bound vs CPU-bound? Kinda confused rn, ngl. Would love to hear how y'all *set up number of workers in playwright* for your setups. Thx in advance! 🚀 *(PS: pls no "it depends" answers... gimme some real-world numbers!)* “” - fastDashX77 - 20-01-2025 Hey! So I usually set up number of workers in playwright based on my machine's cores minus one. Like, if I've got 8 cores, I’ll do 7 workers. But honestly, it *does* depend on your tests. If they’re heavy on I/O (like waiting for APIs), you can go higher. For CPU-heavy stuff, keep it lower. I’ve also used `playwright.config.js` to tweak workers per project. Helps a ton if you’ve got mixed test types. Check out Playwright’s docs on sharding too—might be useful! “” - HyperGhostX - 18-02-2025 I just go with half my CPU cores for the set up number of workers in playwright. Works fine for me, but YMMV. Also, if your tests are flaky, more workers = more pain. Found that out the hard way lol. “” - proxyPioneer99 - 27-02-2025 For real-world numbers, I run 4 workers on a 6-core machine. Any more and my fans sound like a jet engine. Playwright’s default is usually sane, but if you wanna tweak, start low and ramp up. Monitor CPU/memory tho! “” - DarkCloakX - 19-03-2025 Pro tip: Use `--workers=auto` and let Playwright decide. It’s smarter than you think! But if you’re stubborn like me, match it to your cores *minus one* for breathing room. Also, avoid setting up number of workers in playwright too high if your tests share resources (e.g., same DB). “” - AnonHoodX - 28-03-2025 If your tests are I/O-bound, you can *probably* go wild with workers. But CPU-bound? Nah. I’ve had success with `--workers=2 * cores` for API tests, but for E2E, I stick to cores - 1. Playwright’s GitHub has some wild debates on this—worth a skim! “” - ghostlyScreenX - 01-04-2025 Honestly, just benchmark it. Run your suite with 2, 4, 8 workers and compare. I found that set up number of workers in playwright beyond 6 didn’t help me at all—just added noise. Also, `playwright test --list` can help gauge test duration before optimizing. “” - deepDartX77 - 03-04-2025 Thx everyone! 🙌 Tried `--workers=auto` and it’s *kinda* magic? Also bumped it to 6 on my 8-core machine and saw a nice speedup. But now I’m curious—how do you handle worker setup in CI? Same logic? Or do you cap it lower? (Also, big shoutout for the `os.cpus()` tip—didn’t know that was a thing!) “” - FirewallStorm77 - 04-04-2025 I’ve seen folks use `os.cpus().length` in the config to auto-set workers. Fancy, huh? But yeah, for most projects, cores - 1 is the sweet spot. Unless you’re testing on a potato. Then godspeed. “” - darkHawkX - 04-04-2025 If you’re in CI, check your provider’s docs. Some limit workers weirdly. Locally, I do cores + 1 for I/O stuff. Controversial, but it works for me. Playwright’s `--trace` can help spot bottlenecks too! |