I feel you on the inconsistency thing. One day it’s like a genius, the next it’s just... nah.
I’ve been using UseLLM output mostly for creative stuff—like writing prompts or coming up with ideas for blog posts. But for anything technical or super precise, I double-check with ChatGPT-4 or even Google Scholar if it’s research-heavy.
Honestly, I think it’s all about knowing its limits. It’s a tool, not a replacement for human judgment.
I’ve been using UseLLM output mostly for creative stuff—like writing prompts or coming up with ideas for blog posts. But for anything technical or super precise, I double-check with ChatGPT-4 or even Google Scholar if it’s research-heavy.
Honestly, I think it’s all about knowing its limits. It’s a tool, not a replacement for human judgment.