Hey everyone,
So I’ve been diving into web automation lately, and I keep hearing about puppeteer vs selenium detection. Which one’s actually harder to detect? Like, I know both have their quirks, but I’m curious if one’s more stealthy than the other.
From what I’ve read, Puppeteer’s headless mode can sometimes leave traces that sites pick up on, but Selenium’s been around forever, so a lot of sites are *super* tuned to catch it. Still, I’ve seen some folks say Puppeteer’s newer and less predictable, so maybe it’s harder to detect?
Anyone got real-world experience with this? Like, have you noticed one getting flagged more than the other? Or is it just a toss-up depending on the site?
Also, are there any tricks to make either one less detectable? I’m kinda new to this, so any tips would be awesome!
Cheers!
Hey! So I’ve been using both Puppeteer and Selenium for a while now, and honestly, it really depends on the site. Puppeteer’s headless mode is pretty good, but yeah, it does leave some traces. Selenium, on the other hand, is like the OG of automation, so sites are *super* good at catching it.
If you’re looking for stealth, I’d say Puppeteer is slightly better just because it’s newer and less predictable. But you gotta tweak it a bit—like disabling the `navigator.webdriver` flag and using proxies.
For tools, check out `puppeteer-extra` and its stealth plugin. It’s a game-changer for making Puppeteer less detectable.
From my experience, Selenium gets flagged way more often. Sites have built-in detectors that look for Selenium’s fingerprints, like the `webdriver` property. Puppeteer is a bit harder to detect, but it’s not foolproof either.
If you’re serious about avoiding detection, you’ll need to use some tricks. For Puppeteer, try randomizing user agents and adding delays between actions. For Selenium, there are libraries like `undetected-chromedriver` that help mask its presence.
Honestly, it’s a cat-and-mouse game. You’ll need to keep updating your scripts as sites get smarter.
Puppeteer vs Selenium detection is such a hot topic! I’ve found that Puppeteer is generally harder to detect, but only if you configure it properly. Sites are getting really good at spotting automation, so you gotta stay ahead of the curve.
One thing that works for me is using a headful browser instead of headless. It’s slower, but way less likely to get flagged. Also, rotating IPs and using residential proxies can help a ton.
If you’re new to this, I’d recommend starting with Puppeteer and experimenting with its stealth settings. It’s easier to tweak than Selenium, imo.
I’ve been down this rabbit hole too! Puppeteer is definitely less detectable out of the box, but Selenium can be stealthy if you put in the work.
For Puppeteer, the `puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth` is a must. It hides a lot of the telltale signs that sites look for. For Selenium, you’ll need to mess with the browser profile and disable stuff like `webdriver`.
Also, don’t forget about browser fingerprinting. Sites can detect automation based on how your browser behaves, so randomizing things like screen resolution and fonts can help.
Wow, thanks for all the insights, everyone! This is super helpful. I’ve been playing around with Puppeteer and the `puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth` like a few of you suggested, and it’s definitely making a difference.
I tried running a few tests on some sites that were flagging me before, and it seems like the stealth plugin is doing its job. Still, I’m curious—has anyone tried combining Puppeteer with something like a headful browser and proxies? Does it make a noticeable difference, or is it overkill?
Also, for those using Selenium, how often do you find yourselves having to update your scripts to avoid detection? It sounds like a lot of work, but I’m wondering if it’s worth it for certain use cases.
Thanks again for all the tips—this thread has been a goldmine!
Honestly, both Puppeteer and Selenium can be detected if you’re not careful. But Puppeteer feels like the better option for staying under the radar.
I’ve had success using Puppeteer with a combination of stealth plugins and proxies. Sites are less likely to flag you if your traffic looks organic.
For Selenium, it’s a bit trickier. You’ll need to use tools like `undetected-chromedriver` or manually tweak the browser settings. It’s doable, but Puppeteer is just easier to work with imo.
Puppeteer vs Selenium detection is such a nuanced topic. I’ve used both, and here’s my take: Puppeteer is better for stealth, but only if you configure it right.
Selenium is like a giant red flag for most sites. They’ve had years to build detectors for it. Puppeteer is newer, so it’s not as widely targeted—yet.
If you’re serious about avoiding detection, look into browser fingerprinting and how sites track automation. Tools like `puppeteer-extra` and `selenium-stealth` can help, but they’re not magic bullets.
I’ve been automating stuff for a while, and Puppeteer is my go-to for stealth. Selenium is just too easy to detect unless you’re willing to put in a lot of effort.
For Puppeteer, the stealth plugin is a lifesaver. It hides a lot of the stuff that sites look for, like the `webdriver` flag. You can also randomize mouse movements and add delays to make it look more human.
Selenium is doable, but it’s a pain. You’ll need to mess with the browser profile and use tools like `undetected-chromedriver` to avoid detection.
Puppeteer is definitely harder to detect than Selenium, but it’s not perfect. Sites are getting smarter, so you’ll need to tweak your setup to stay under the radar.
One thing that works for me is using Puppeteer in headful mode with randomized settings. It’s slower, but way less likely to get flagged. Also, rotating proxies and user agents can help a lot.
For Selenium, it’s a bit of a lost cause unless you’re willing to put in a ton of effort. Sites have had years to build detectors for it, so it’s just not worth it imo.
|
